• HOME
    HOME
  • INSIDER HOME
    INSIDER HOME
  • POPULAR CATEGORIES
    POPULAR CATEGORIES
    • Hunting
      Hunting
    • Wildlife Management
      Wildlife Management
    • Lands & Access
      Lands & Access
    • Community Hatchery Program
      Community Hatchery Program
  • SUPPORT THE OFAH
    SUPPORT THE OFAH
    • DONATE
      DONATE
    • MEMBERSHIP
      MEMBERSHIP
    • PROSHOP
      PROSHOP
  • CONTACT US
    CONTACT US
logo
  • HOME
    HOME
  • INSIDER HOME
    INSIDER HOME
  • POPULAR CATEGORIES
    POPULAR CATEGORIES
    • Hunting
      Hunting
    • Wildlife Management
      Wildlife Management
    • Lands & Access
      Lands & Access
    • Community Hatchery Program
      Community Hatchery Program
  • SUPPORT THE OFAH
    SUPPORT THE OFAH
    • DONATE
      DONATE
    • MEMBERSHIP
      MEMBERSHIP
    • PROSHOP
      PROSHOP
  • CONTACT US
    CONTACT US
Search..
logo
logo
Conservation Area, Thunder Bay
1 / 1
1 / 1

Ontario in dire need for new conservation funding methods

September 29, 2021
-
Uncategorized
-
No comments
-
Posted by Allison Robertson

Author’s Note: There is a critical need for conservation funding in Ontario. Most of our readers are anglers and hunters who contribute a large percentage of the funds Ontario currently uses for fish and wildlife management, so we encourage you to provide thoughts on how to address this funding crisis. Please e-mail us at: policy@ofah.org or comment on the story below.

 

The current main source of funding for fish and wildlife management in Ontario comes through a joint funding system where the Fish and Wildlife Special Purpose Account (SPA) contributes approximately two-thirds of the program’s budget, while general tax revenue contributes the remaining one-third of the funding. The Fish & Wildlife SPA is a dedicated account that includes revenue from 100% of all fishing, hunting, and trapping license sales, as well as fines and royalties under certain pieces of legislation. It provides roughly $71 million annually to fish and wildlife conservation and management, meaning that anglers and hunters shoulder most of the burden of supporting the provincial fish and wildlife program. This is a huge sum of money from what amounts to a small percentage of Ontario’s population, and unfortunately, the cost of managing Ontario’s natural resources is increasing and the amount of money in the SPA has not kept pace. We’re on the cusp of seeing a significant gap between the funding we need for management and what’s available through the SPA.

 

HOW IS SPA FUNDING USED?

 

The funding is first divided into six categories and then split between specific policies, projects and programs, conservation officers and enforcement, and licence and outdoors card manufacturing. The funds given to the Planning Policy and Regulatory section are used to help manage commercial and recreational fisheries and manage fish and wildlife habitat. This is crucial to help conserve these species and the resources they need to survive. Species and Ecosystem Science uses funds for research and monitoring of fish and wildlife species. This allows Ontario to track which species are most vulnerable and which are thriving. Funding provided to Population Health, Rehabilitation and Enhancement allows for fish and wildlife ecosystem maintenance, including invasive species management and control. It also provides funding for fish and wildlife disease management.

 

Approximately 19% of the SPA funds go to conservation officers and enforcement, which are critical in helping to protect our natural resources. Safety, Education, and Promotion are also very important as it provides people with the education needed to keep themselves and others safe. Funding given to this section provides education to hunters as well as wildlife education and communication, the prevention and management of human and wildlife conflict, and public outreach.

Although general tax revenue contributes significant funds to the total fish and wildlife program, the SPA makes up the bulk of the contribution, heavily relying on anglers and hunters to participate each season. If participation declines, so too will SPA funding, which will greatly impact the ability to manage fish and wildlife. Even with the contributions currently collected, these funds have not been enough to implement the numerous conservation projects and programs that are in dire need of support.

 

WHAT ELSE CAN WE DO TO INCREASE CONSERVATION FUNDING?

 

In the United States, the main source of funding for fish and wildlife conservation initiatives is collected through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act (known as Pittman-Robertson), which created a manufacture’s excise tax on ammunition and firearms in 1937. This generates between $500-million and $850-million annually for wildlife restoration. In 1950 the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act (known as Dingell-Johnson) was also established to create a manufacturer’s excise tax where sales of fishing equipment, motors, and motorboat fuel provide funding to sport fish restoration. The money collected through this tax is largely dependent on how many consumers buy hunting and fishing gear each year.

 

Ontario anglers and hunters are already contributing the majority of the SPA funds through licence fees, fines, and royalties, but imagine how much more funding would be allocated to fish and wildlife conservation if we were able to pass even a small excise tax on other outdoor recreation equipment. Contributions to the SPA shouldn’t be solely on anglers and hunters. Many people enjoy the outdoors through other recreational means — backpacking, mountain biking, hiking, kayaking, and bird watching. So why should anglers and hunters shoulder most of the responsibility for conserving our land, water, fish, and wildlife? How can we drive more funding into conservation efforts without dipping back into our fellow angler’s and hunter’s pockets? This is an important conversation.

 

Some people have discussed creating a ‘backpack tax’, which would be similar to the excise tax on shooting equipment mentioned above, but it would apply to a much broader range of outdoor equipment. Hypothetically, a percentage of every ATV, pair of binoculars, hiking boots, or filleting knife sold could be set aside for conservation efforts and would allow others to contribute to protecting the planet. The organizations that manage forests and water ways used for recreation could also have an excise tax on equipment, gear, watercrafts, and motorized vehicles rented to the public. Those are just some examples. There are many questions we can continue to ask to help determine the appropriate path forward. Questions like what percentage of the cost to buy or rent an item is affordable to individuals contributing meaningful revenue to the SPA? Are there other options for people to contribute to funding? Would an excise tax on activities versus an excise tax on equipment be more accepted?

 

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

 

Contributing to conservation is an investment in a better future. Working to conserve today’s environment will ensure that hunting and fishing remain sustainable for generations. Every restoration project and conserved species provides numerous ecological services with broad benefits. Healthy forests, wetlands, and waterways provides essential habitat to fish and wildlife species and provide Ontarians with clean air and water, places to recreate, and improved mental health. If we did not fund conservation projects all of this would diminish, we would lose our clean lakes and beautiful forests and our future generations might never have the opportunity to fish for an Atlantic Salmon, hunt a Black Bear, or even see certain species in the wild.

 

THE TAKE HOME

 

The pressure to conserve fish, wildlife, and ecosystems is continuously growing – but funding mechanisms haven’t kept pace. Creating better systems to provide more funding is key in preserving what we have today for current and future generations. Whether this be through an excise tax or other means, we all have a responsibility to contribute to conserving our native lands and species.

Like
0
Tweet
0
Email
PREVIOUS POST
Raising bucks for conservation and welcoming new OFAH supporters
NEXT POST
OFAH releases public version of the firearms report filed with the Federal Court
author

Allison Robertson

OHAH Intern
Allison Robertson was one of OFAH’s Fish and Wildlife Conservation Interns. Allison holds a B.Sc. in Biology from Queen’s University. Allison brings some angling experience, as well as scientific experience to the OFAH. Allison continues to contribute to conservation efforts through her volunteer work with different environmental organizations. In her spare time, Allison enjoys exploring in nature and capturing wildlife through her camera lens.
Recent Posts
  • OFAH testimony to SECU on firearms Bill C-21
  • OFAH Community Conservation Fund Investments
  • Bill C-21: 8 things than can and should be done by government
  • Ontario to make changes to controlled deer hunt
  • Roof racks and your insurance
Recent Comments
  • Greg on Municipal handgun bylaws – what’s happening and why does OFAH care?
  • Rick Bisset on Falconry, in its entirety, has finally arrived in Ontario!
  • Dan Mansell on Falconry, in its entirety, has finally arrived in Ontario!
  • Charles Potvin on Municipal handgun bylaws – what’s happening and why does OFAH care?
  • Brian on Falconry, in its entirety, has finally arrived in Ontario!
Categories
  • ALUS Peterborough
  • Catch the Ace
  • Community Hatchery Program
  • Firearms
  • Fishing
  • Hunting
  • Invading Species Awareness Program
  • Lake Ontario Atlantic Salmon Restoration Program
  • Lands & Access
  • Lottery
  • Media Release
  • NASP
  • News
  • OFAH Membership
  • OHEP
  • Programs
  • Thoughts
  • Uncategorized
  • Video
  • Wildlife Management

Leave a Comment

Your feedback is valuable for us. Your email will not be published.
Cancel Reply

Please wait...
Submit Comment →

Related News

Other posts that you should not miss
A lone large Black Bear

A look at the return of Ontario’s Spring Bear Hunt

May 20, 2021
-
Posted by Dr. Keith Munro
May 1st marked the full return of the spring bear hunt in Ontario. While the immediate benefits to bear management, bear hunters and northern businesses and communities are obvious,
Read More →
Hunting, Thoughts, Uncategorized, Wildlife Management
4 MIN READ
ORANGE hat

The Facts on Firearms

Sticky Post
-
May 6, 2021
-
Posted by Matt DeMille
The OFAH has developed a series of resources to challenge myths with facts and help better inform the general public, media,
Read More →
Firearms, Uncategorized
19 MIN READ
Caution Poison Ivy

A special sign and a great story for OFAH Catch The Ace winner

April 30, 2021
-
Posted by Robert Pye
On Sunday April 25, Roxanne Pickering, of Sudbury picked up on a special sign. “Signs, signs everywhere there’s signs” – was
Read More →
Catch the Ace, Lottery, Uncategorized
2 MIN READ
Ontario in dire need for new conservation funding methods - OFAH Insider